The Devil Wears Prada

Posted by Terry Nelson on Apr 23rd, 2007

 Editing note:  I meant to post this at the ‘other’ Abbey, and mistakenly posted it here.

I just watched the film again.  I like the movie because Miranda Priestly reminds me so much of my former Senior Vice-President, Andrew Markopoulos, whom I worked for at Dayton-Hudson, which turned into Marshall Fields, and now finally turned into Macy’s - Oh! thank God Andy died before that happened!  (I posted about this film before, after I first viewed it, that post was a more thoughtful look at fashion from a Catholic perspective.)

However, I just want to post a bit of dialog from the film that perfectly sums up the influence and reason for haute couture…

After she laughs at a discussion over a belt, Miranda asks Andy what she is laughing about…you could imagine that Andy’s laugh might cause those present in the room to consider how superficial and frivolous the fashion world is: 

Andrea Sachs: “No, no, nothing. Y’know, it’s just that both those belts look exactly the same to me. Y’know, I’m still learning about all this stuff.” 

Miranda Priestly:  “This… ’stuff’? Oh… ok. I see, you think this has nothing to do with you. You go to your closet and you select out, oh I don’t know, that lumpy blue sweater, for instance, because you’re trying to tell the world that you take yourself too seriously to care about what you put on your back. But what you don’t know is that that sweater is not just blue, it’s not turquoise, it’s not lapis, it’s actually cerulean. You’re also blindly unaware of the fact that in 2002, Oscar De La Renta did a collection of cerulean gowns. And then I think it was Yves St Laurent, wasn’t it, who showed cerulean military jackets? And then cerulean quickly showed up in the collections of 8 different designers. Then it filtered down through the department stores and then trickled on down into some tragic casual corner where you, no doubt, fished it out of some clearance bin. However, that blue represents millions of dollars and countless jobs and so it’s sort of comical how you think that you’ve made a choice that exempts you from the fashion industry when, in fact, you’re wearing the sweater that was selected for you by the people in this room. From a pile of stuff.” 

That is what the business is really all about.  What did they tell Bush Sr. years ago?  “It’s the economy, stupid.”

(I just liked the dialog and thought posting it would be a nice tribute to Andrew Markopoulos, whose birthday was around this time - he was just as tough and demanding as Miranda Priestly, and he taught me a lot.  May he rest in peace.) 

6 Responses

  1. elena maria vidal Says:

    I enjoyed that movie, too. I just could not understand why that lovely young girl was shacking up with that chef. Meryl Streep was great in it, that’s for sure.

  2. Jeron Says:

    I loved this movie, too. And this scene you posted was insightful and really made me feel for the character of Miranda Priestly.

  3. Terry Nelson Says:

    Elena- I felt exactly the same way about the chef relationship - I was also dissapointed she got out of the car and quit Miranda.

    Jeron - I agree with you as well.

  4. elena maria vidal Says:

    Yes, me too. I thought she should have stayed with Miranda.

  5. nab Says:

    I find it interesting that Versace did a collection with Ganswain as her muse, and then Gautier Couture with Nuns and the Virgin Mary as style points. I wonder what this means?

  6. Jeron Says:

    Just wanna say once more how much I love Meryl Streep. She’s my favorite actress; has been for many years. And this pic Terry has posted is flawless! I wish she looked this good at the Academy Awards this year. She looked like she was channeling an Indian priestess or something! bleck.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Untitled Document

Calendar

April 2007
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Pages

Categories

Blogroll