That document on Limbo…

Posted by Terry Nelson on Apr 22nd, 2007

 

From what I understand, it can’t change the perennial teaching of the Church…

Rorate Caeli and Immaculate Heart of Mary Hermitage seem to have it right:

[Errors of the Synod of Pistoia.] The doctrine which rejects as a Pelagian fable that place of the lower regions (which the faithful generally designate by the name of limbo of the children) in which the souls of those departing with the sole guilt of original sin are punished with the punishment of the condemned, exclusive of the punishment of fire [...] is false, rash, injurious to Catholic schools.

Auctorem Fidei
Pius VI
August 28, 1794

(Quote courtesy of Rorate Caeli.)

Vespers

Posted by Terry Nelson on Apr 21st, 2007

“I will praise you, Lord, with all my heart…

See how my enemies turn back,  how they stumble and perish before you.

You upheld the justice of my cause; you sat enthroned, judging with justice.”  - Psalm 9

Monjas Coronadas - Crowned Nuns

Posted by Terry Nelson on Apr 21st, 2007

Pictured, a Conceptionist nun.

In the autumn of 2005 the Smithsonian held an exhibition of “retratos” or Latin American portraiture, included amongst the collection were portraits of Crowned Nuns.

Popular in Mexico during the Viceregal period in the 17th and 18th centuries, many nuns were depicted as the royal bride of Christ before making their profession in an enclosed monastery.  It was especially popular amongst the Jeronomites, Poor Clares, and Conceptionist nuns.

During colonial times in Mexico, a woman pretty much had two options, marriage or monastic life.  Reading the life of Teresa of Avila, though set in 16th century Spain, gives one some insight into convent life of her time, as well as that of the colonial period in New Spain.  Some convents were less observant and a caste system was indeed in place, hence, girls from poorer families would normally not be able to afford such portraiture, much less the dowries expected in those days.

In the beginning, the portraits were often paid for by the family of the new nun, and were perhaps less extravagant than the example shown here.   As time and prosperity advanced, along with it emerged the regal court-like nuances in monastic life, hence the portraiture became more grand and elaborate, if not ostentatious.

Pictured, a Jeronomite nun.

The crown of course represents the nun’s espousal to Christ as his bride.  Rich embroidery often ornamented her cloak, while she carried elaborate emblems of her religious title, often draped in relicarios, waxen flowers, ribbons and other elegant details.  It was the final act of vanity for a woman who was leaving the world and her status behind to live a consecrated life.  Although, as history reveals, status and prominence, as well as vain additions of trims to the habit were not uncommon as a woman established herself in the religious milieu.

In defense of Miss Mexico once again, the ‘fashion’ associated with crowned nuns also may have influenced young Mexican girls in their dress for special fiestas and events, such as 1st Communions, etc.

Pictured, contemporary Poor Clares.

The tradition of crowned nuns is not peculiar to Mexico, only the elaborate and regal style seems to be.  In monastic life, nuns often wear a crown of roses or another flower, symbol of their espousal to Christ and carry a candle, representative of Baptism, as seen in this photo from a Poor Clare’s profession.

Today, it seems women who enter the cloister are more apt to have a farewell Mass and perhaps a reception before entering the cloister, which can later be an embarrassment if they don’t persevere.  In the 18th century, when one entered the cloister, you really never left, like it or not - hence, one possible explanation for the resulting decadence in some houses.

    

It’s just tissue!

Posted by Terry Nelson on Apr 20th, 2007

I am such a product of our culture, I have a really hard time geting my mind around the fact that a foetus is really a person - until I see a picture of an aborted child.  When I hear about abortion, I am naturally tempted to believe a piece of tissue was removed in the process referred to as “medical termination” - even if it looks like a cut up alien, resembling human beings…in that case, I want to convince myself it was more like a tumor being removed.  In fact, medical termination of pregnancy is little more than removing a aggressive growth, threatening some aspect of the mother’s life.  We can rationalize it that way.

I posted a picture of an aborted baby today, not realizing it would be a source of stress for those who would experience the photo.  (I took it down because it offended a friend who lost a child, and the photo reminded her of that tragedy.)  I posted it precisely because I do not understand “birth and babies” as the line goes from “Gone With The Wind”.

I’m a single guy, I never got a woman pregnant, I never fathered children.  I posted it because unconsciously, most people, pro-life or not - but especially if you buy the pro-choice bull shit - mostpeople are in denial. We convince ourselves it’s just tissue.  It’s not a baby.  It’s a growth that needs to be surgically removed.  It has to be evacuated for the health of the mother.  Or, it has to be removed because it is deformed, or it’s going to be retarded.  Get rid of it!  Ick!  Who wants to give birth to a tard or crippled or deformed kid?

Even pro-life people forget that we need to be reminded of what it is that is butchered; what is killed, is a viable human being - even when it looks like ET.  Over and over, we need to be reminded.  Otherwise, we can easily slip into the same, cold, calculating apathy of the surgeon and health care worker.  We simplyend up talking ideologies, political concepts, religious or non-religious convictions.  It’s all too intellectualized, too cerebral, disconnected from the reality. 

An aborted foetus - A BABY - needs to be seen in order to understand the crime.  Otherwise most people, who may, or may not be as pro-life as ourselves, will continue to believe these ‘things’ are just tissue, a growth that needed to be evacuated - no matter the reason.

I’m Roman Catholic and strongly pro-life, but I still have a part of me that wants to rationalize the abortion thing, convincing myself it (the foetus) is just tissue, or at best, undeveloped embryo.  That temptation occurs when I listen to newscasts or any other sympathetic presentation in media for the pro-choice side of things. 

It happens.  Human nature revolts against suffering - our nature will do anything to avoid it, to protect ourselves from it, even deny it.  I believe that’s why so may churches have pretty crucifixes; Jesus with a nice body, relaxed and sweet upon the cross - no wounds, no blood.  Sometimes we substitute a resurrected Christ, depicted clothed and glorious - no suffering.  We just can’t tolerate reality.

We can’t handle the truth. 

Obviously, no one reads me…

Posted by Terry Nelson on Apr 20th, 2007

 

I am on record predicting the Motu Proprio will be released either April 29, Good Shepherd Sunday, or April 30th, the feast of Pope Pius V.  Gosh!

Now two big shots are predicting the date as if they suddenly figured it all out, saying, “The hot tip now is that the Motu will be released April 30…”

Such motu mouths!

(Painting: Paul Cadmus, “Bar Italia” depicting American expatriots in Rome, gossiping away their day…) 

Monsignor Richard J. Schuler

Posted by Terry Nelson on Apr 20th, 2007

 

Monsignor Schuler 

A wonderful Priest and educator, responsible for nurturing numerous vocations to the priesthood and religious life, has died in the early hours of this morning, April 20th, 2007.  He ws imbued with the correct “Spirit of Vatican Council II” which he preserved and promoted in his parish church, the Church of St. Agnes, in St. Paul, Minnesota.  He was indeed a gentleman, scholar, classical musician, liturgist, and above all, an extraordinary good and faithful Priest.  May he rest in peace.

Go here for a brief biography.

This makes me sick…

Posted by Terry Nelson on Apr 20th, 2007

One in thirty babies survive abortions…some live for hours, some live to grow up.  Abortion is diabolical.  I’m stunned at man’s cruelty - it is sanitized Nazism we are tolerating.

Read the article:  One in thirty survive abortion.

A large percentage of abortions are done for no other reason than convenience.  Pro-life people know this, yet sometimes the realization can once again overwhelm one when one reads about these things.

The world should be shaking in it’s boots right now, with knees knocking together, hair standing on end, fright.

Bruder Konrad von Parzham

Posted by Terry Nelson on Apr 20th, 2007

The eve of St. Conrad.

April 21st is the feast of St. Conrad of Parzham…a saint in the long line of lay brother saints in the history of the Church prior to the II Vatican Council.  Don’t get me started on the decline of this vocation to the Church since the Council.

(I could do a whole list of favorite lay brother saints.)

My house…

Posted by Terry Nelson on Apr 19th, 2007

I changed the art above my fireplace for Easter.  I placed an 18th century Guatemalan wooden corpus above the mantle for Holy Week and Easter.  I think I’ll keep him there for the summer. 

A closer look.  “He browses among the lilies.” - Song of Songs

(And no, Senator Keeley and his wife are not coming for dinner.) 

« Prev - Next »

Untitled Document

Calendar

April 2007
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Pages

Categories

Blogroll