Catholic Evangelicals…reflections on a term.

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jul 2nd, 2007

 

The New Evangelization.

Angela has an interesting post concerning her “infiltration” into an Evangelical forum a while back - she’s so slick.  It definitely sounds as if it wasn’t a very good place to express Catholic beliefs in.  I had no idea some Evangelicals were so hostile to Catholicism - and yet we Catholics are so nice as we promote the ‘new springtime’ of Catholic evangelization.

The Catholic “New Evangelization” effort is very good of course, called for and promoted by the Holy Father himself (JPII).  Today, our highly educated laity, the most educated in the history of the Church, is decidedly well motivated and prepared for this work. 

The New Evangelization and weblogs.

I noticed on another popular weblog, several comments about Cardinal Sean O’Malley’s recent statement saying he did not think the interest in the TLM in New England was very strong.  Obviously the wrong thing to say as far as the advocates for the TLM are concerned.  The man who had been the darling of the blogosphere just a few months ago, with several bloggers linking to him and his posts, is now nearly being ripped to shreds - at least in one or two forums I read.  Angela’s post reminded me of those comments.

There appears to be a sort of a Catholic evangelical movement emerging in this country, consisting of highly educated laity whose self-appointed job appears to be the correct interpretation of Church teaching, liturgical reform, and above all - speaking the mind of the Pope.  At least that is the impression I get reading other blogs.  Gratefully, as one blogger once commented, bloggers do not speak for the Church.  Neither do a lot of other voices - no matter what side of the fence they sit on, or what position they hold in a parish.  The Pope, his cardinals and bishops, with their priests do that.

The Church as a career opportunity.

Popular writers and evangelists, all have their following - that is certainly not a bad thing - that is how they stay popular.  However, I believe their success can be an attractive business opportunity for some, while inspiring a career path for others.  Religion can become a business like any other industry.  Recently one blogger complained there would be more men doing parish work if the pay was better, expressing his opinion as to why there were more women working as DRE’s and in other positions on the parish level.  It is a valid point - but does it have to be about money all the time?  I have a nephew who is a Pentecostal minister, he also supports his family by working in construction.  He regards his ministry as a call from God, not a career.

I cannot help but wonder if not a few vocations are lost because a man or woman chooses to work for the Church, rather than enter priesthood or religious life.  Vocations can be lost, “many are called, few are chosen”.  It is not unthinkable that maybe a few young men and women with theology degrees have opted for lay status and independence when they may have been called to religious life.  It may even be a contributing factor as to why a person may leave a religious vocation, after having perceived the life more as a career than a supernatural vocation.  I honestly think many people - who are ‘into” religion - may see religion as a career opportunity or simply a career path, feeling no need to consecrate their lives in the religious state.

I have also noted that a few, if not many bloggers see themselves as evangelizing through their weblogs.  (Yes, we as lay people are called to evangelize, but as Fr. Corapi once said, maybe not so much with words.)  I imagine some of these writers are hoping for their big break into publishing, hoping to be picked up by companies such as Our Sunday Visitor, the Daughters of St. Paul, or some other publishing house.  That can happen and has happened - but again, it’s not a bad thing.  Just an observation, and maybe a question for some, is it evangelization or self promotion?  (Yes, I continually ask myself the same thing.)

Saying and writing the right thing.

However, getting back to the lead subject, the Evangelical website Angela wrote about; in my recent experience, if a person says anything the least bit critical - although you don’t even have to be critical - about one of the popular Catholic icons or talking heads, that person can expect to get nailed by the Catholic evangelicals.  On the flip side of that coin, if you go after a Bishop Trautman, and apparently now, Cardinal Sean, or go after a liberal priest or architect, ripping them a new A-hole - well that doesn’t present much of a problem.

But is this the New Evangelization?  Is this really the role of personal blogs?  Maybe - maybe not - time will tell.

The decline and fall…

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jul 2nd, 2007

Irreplaceable you. 

A report from the United Nations confirms what conservative pro-life pundits have been saying for years, Europe is below fertility replacement levels.  Now it seems, because it hits the UN in the pocketbook, the organization is taking notice.  This from Catholic World News:

The combined donations from these countries– including the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, United Kingdom, Japan, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Canada, and Switzerland– make up 85.6% of UNFPA’s total $389 million revenue from contributions, reports Samantha Singson in C-Fam’s Friday fax.

With the exception of Japan, each of the top UNFPA donor countries has contraceptive prevalence rates well above 70%. The average fertility rate for the top ten donor countries is 1.59. None of the top UNFPA donor countries comes close to achieving a replacement-level fertility rate. - Catholic World News

I find it interesting that the countries listed are the same countries where GLBT issues are given preferential treatment, while providing egual rights, including the campaign for legalization of same sex marriage, as well as legal protection from anyone opposed to the moral implications of the GLBT lifestyle.

The contraceptive mentality and homosexuality.

The two seem to be related.  Ever since the invention of the pill, which provided a no mess, no fuss dimension to the contraceptive  mentality, the practice of contraception ceased to be considered shameful or immoral in contemporary culture.  It seemed everyone was doing it - which was a major factor leading to what is commonly referred to as the Sexual Revolution of the 1960’s. 

The relationship to the acceptance of homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle makes so much sense to contracepting heterosexuals.  Why?  Because both engage in non-reproductive sex.  Sex is sex.  Making love is sex.  If two people love one another, they have sex - without consequence.  Sex between a contracepting couple is no different than sex between two people of the same sex - both are non-reproductive acts for the sheer pleasure involved.  (Despite the fact the couples insist they are “making love”.)

Neutralizing sexual relations.

Today, with the morning after pill, the birth control pill is not always a necessity.  It is well known that many young people do not consider fellatio sex - the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal brought that notion to our attention.   Acts of sodomy are performed by heterosexuals as well as homosexuals, to escape the consequences of natural intercourse, this fact came to light in some of the sports sex scandals over the years.  (However, it is my understanding that married, non-contracepting couples may engage in similar acts, with the exception of anal sex, during foreplay, so long as the end result is natural intercourse open to life.) 

My point is this, if heterosexuals are having sex in the same manner as homosexuals, and both are non-reproductive, hedonistic indulgence, it would be hypocritical for a society not to recognize same sex partners as equal to themselves. 

One sin protects the other - or links to another - in the diabolic chain forged by Planned Parenthood and the Human Rights Campaign agenda.  Even at the expense of annihilation.   

At Fatima, Our Lady warned that if her requests were not heeded, “many nations will be annihilated”.   Here we thought she was speaking  about nuclear extinction.  Perhaps not. 

Calendar

July 2007
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Pages

Categories

Blogroll