Tax collectors and prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God before you…

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jan 31st, 2008

 

I got a new attitude, ooh, ooh, ooh!

While researching some things on the Carthusians, I came across the following quote, attributed to Fr. Raphael Diamond, the deceased prior of the Vermont Chaterhouse.

“Davidson was Roman Catholic who had a kind of faith,” as Father Diamond put it, “that did not need to be fulfilled by attending weekly services.” - Joseph George davidson, PhD - founder of the Vermont Charterhouse. 

I liked the way Fr. Diamond stated that.  I’m adopting that attitude from this day forward,  as regards relatives and friends who do not go to Mass, or those I once may have considered “luke-warm” or “irreligious”.

I suppose some ubers will protest, “But!  But!  We have to tell people they are sinning and warn them they are going to hell!  We are required to offer fraternal correction.”  Yeah… so…

Anyway - from now on, I’ll certainly hesitate before self-righteously calling other people “lukewarm” or “Sunday Catholics,” simply because I cannot know their level of faith, their interior life, or even if their faith is so strong they do not need to go to Church as often as I do.  Instead, I can keep the fact that I am much worse than others, ever before my eyes.

So just talk amongst yourselves in church.  ;) 

The Real Presence.

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jan 31st, 2008

 

Presence does not deny physical reality. 

I don’t know if it is the same at your church, but in my local parish, the tabernacle is off to the side, although still within the sanctuary.  I have noticed that lectors, servers, and even the priest will reverence the altar of sacrifice as they are getting ready for Mass, but they rarely genuflect towards the tabernacle. 

When I am at adoration outside of Mass (the Blessed Sacrament is not exposed, but reposes in the tabernacle) if the pastor, or any parish worker, such as the music director/liturgist, enters the church or walks across the sanctuary, they rarely, if ever, reverence the Blessed Sacrament.  I’ve seen the same conduct at other churches.

Crisis of faith.

I always wonder why.  I think that there is an ongoing general confusion as to what the real presence means to contemporary Catholics.  I think there is still a crisis of faith as regards the Eucharist.  I found this from a conference by the late Fr. Hardon:

“There are those who laudably emphasize the subjective aspect of Christ’s presence, but at the expense of the objective reality. Let me not be misunderstood. There is great need, even crucial need, to talk about and act upon the awareness of Christ in the Eucharist, and to raise our sentiments of love towards Him; but this cannot be at the expense of ignoring the prior fact that Christ is actually in the Eucharist, that in the words of the Church’s solemn teaching, “He is contained under the perceptible species of bread and wine.” What was bread and wine, after the words of consecration are no longer bread and wine but the living, physical, bodily presence-in a word, the real Jesus Christ. To believe in the Real Presence means to believe in the real absence of bread and wine after the consecration.

In the Eucharist there is present the “totus Christus” (the whole Christ) just as truly as He was present on earth in Palestine and as He is now in Heaven. It is the total Christ in the fullness of what makes Christ Christ, with no real difference between who He was in the first century on earth and who He is now in the twentieth century on earth. Jesus Christ is in Jemez Springs as He is also everywhere where a duly ordained priest has changed bread and wine into the Body and Blood of the Savior.

How this needs resaying in today’s Catholic world. But we are not yet finished. As so often happens, error arises among men because they have been neglecting the truth. The hydra of Communism is partly God’s visitation for the neglect by Christians of their practice of community love. So too with the Eucharist. Too many Catholics, including priests, have taken the Real Presence for granted. They complacently assume that Christ is in the Eucharist, and they proceed to leave Him there, in empty churches and empty chapels, with seldom a worshipper before the tabernacle and seldom a eucharistic thought among millions of believers, who would be offended if they were told that they ignored the greatest reality in the universe right in their midst. - Christ In the Eucharist, Fr. John Hardon

Despite the fact adoration chapels spring up across the country, and many more people commit to a regular schedule of adoration of the Blessed Sacrament, I get the impression that not a few people - those who ought to know better -  regard the real presence of Christ in a sort of  ”out of sight, out of mind” fashion - especially when the Sacrament is reposed in the tabernacle.

In addition, I think there is an incomplete understanding, (by a highly theologized laity), as to what the real presence actually means.  Very traditional priests will sometimes say, “The presence of Christ in the Eucharist is not a physical presence, but a sacramental presence.”  Fr. Neuhaus referred to this terminology in a post last Christmas on First Things; he wrote:

“Theologians of an orthodox persuasion sometimes say that the Real Presence does not mean physical presence. This is to guard against the debased notion of a cannibalistic consumption of a portion of human flesh and blood. That is indeed a gross distortion of our being encountered by, and receiving body and soul, the living Christ in his humanity and divinity. Yet I have come across people who are deeply troubled when they hear it said that the Real Presence is not a physical presence. They misunderstand that to mean that his presence is less than physical, when the point is that his presence is more than physical. The physical is part of the finitude of space and time, which is both embraced and transcended in the wonder of God become man. Finitum capax infiniti.” - Fr. John Neuhaus  

I don’t know, but I think a few creative theologians and some of their students, along with some RCIA instructors, just might be complicating doctrine when it comes to instructing the faithful about the Eucharist and the real presence of Christ.  I think this problem runs deeper than the issue of Communion in the hand, although that practice seems to have  certainly contributed to a lack of reverence.  One  cannot teach that Christ is not physically present in the Eucharist, yet insist that he is truly and really present, body, blood, soul, and divinity.  It is like saying, “I believe in the Eucharist as presence but not as reality, or as reality that is only presence and not objective actuality.” (Fr. Hardon)

Nevertheless, I think many contemporary Catholics must suffer from this type of  misunderstanding.  What other reason could there be for such a lack of reverence for the Blessed Sacrament?


 The Physical Reality of Christ’s Body and Blood
in the Eucharist
To avoid misunderstanding this sacramental presence which surpasses the laws of nature and constitutes the greatest miracle of its kind we must listen with docility to the voice of the teaching and praying Church. This voice, which constantly echoes the voice of Christ, assures us that the way Christ is made present in this Sacrament is none other than by the change of the whole substance of the bread into His Body, and of the whole substance of the wine into His Blood, and that this unique and truly wonderful change the Catholic Church rightly calls transubstantiation. As a result of transubstantiation, the species of bread and wine undoubtedly take on a new meaning and a new finality, for they no longer remain ordinary bread and ordinary wine, but become the sign of something sacred, the sign of a spiritual food. However, the reason they take on this new significance and this new finality is simply because they contain a new “reality” which we may justly term ontological. Not that there lies under those species what was already there before, but something quite different; and that not only because of the faith of the Church, but in objective reality, since after the change of the substance or nature of the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Christ, nothing remains of the bread and wine but the appearances, under which Christ, whole and entire, in His physical “reality” is bodily present, although not in the same way that bodies are present in a given place.

- Pope Paul VI in Mysterium Fidei 

Photo credit: Roving Medievalist

 

 

Lovely Rita…

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jan 29th, 2008

The private chapel of St. Rita.

Craig Hamilton’s work has not gotten much airing on the internet, or even in American classical circles; yet, this handsome private chapel (Georgian Award, 2006) in northern Britain shows a remarkable freeness and ease within the architectural language chosen, quietly mingling aspects of Sir John Soane’s work with Michelangelesque pediments and a convincing surety of form. I can only hope to see more documentation on this unjustifiably-neglected architect in the future. - New Liturgical Movement

NLM is one of the very best blogs online, and Matthew Alderman is working on a series of posts focused upon contemporary ecclesial art and architecture by traditional artists and architects.  Mr. Alderman writes:

One thing I would like our readers to consider over the next few days as I post other new architectural and sculptural work by outstanding traditional artists, I think many of our readers–and many Catholics of a traditional bent–are too quick to reject the work of most of the few talented artists out there because of issues of style. This is unfortunate, as often the only other option is to resort to inferior, mechanically-produced copies, a solution seized upon entirely too quickly as a viable option. This is not to say style is immaterial, but the issue of Gothic versus Classic versus Romanesque at this point in time serves to cloud the larger issue of artistic quality. Not all Gothic, or Romanesque, or Baroque, is created equal, and a partisan enthusiasm for one particular traditional style over another, whatever its legitimate merits, should not excuse faulty workmanship. -NLM 

St. Rita; a bronze for a marvelously inventive private chapel done by British architect Craig Hamilton. - NLM

No press coverage for the March For Life…

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jan 29th, 2008

 

So what’s new?

Many, many people have complained about the lack of press coverage for the annual March For Life in Washington, D.C., which took place last week in opposition to our country’s abortion laws.  It happens every year - the press virtually ignore the event.  Most political leaders ignore the event as well, and although our pro-life President never shows up, he makes a safe, diplomatic, phoned-in speech of support. 

This year the lack of press coverage has been blamed (by some)  on the death of a movie actor.  Pro-life supporters believe the secular press used coverage of Heath Ledger’s death to ignore what they usually ignore every year anyway - the March For Life.

It also goes without saying that the little tin gods in the media did their level best to ignore and obfuscate this colossal event. When the homosexual propaganda film star, Heath Ledger, died of a drug overdose on two nights before the March, that provided the hedonistic media the perfect reason to wail and gnash their teeth for a prolonged period of time about their immoral agenda and derail coverage of the life event.” - Fr. Euteneuer

I have the deepest respect and admiration for Fr. Euteneuer, and I certainly appreciate the frustration with the press in his statement.  I also have no doubt there is media bias against the pro-life movement - we witness it every year.   Having said that, how do we explain the fact that media in our country also ignores just about every other humanitarian news story that doesn’t have a connection to celebrity news, economic fears, climate change, or the political race for president?

What network news agency in this country is actively reporting upon the terror the people of Kenya  are currently enduring?  Or the murder of priests  and nuns so often repeated throughout African and Muslim countries?  Although it is old news, what do we ever hear of the ongoing genocide in Sudan?  Or the continual sufferings of peoples just about anyplace you look in Africa?  While NO ONE in this country ever seems willing to report on the progrom of extermination against the Palestinian people  by Israel?

So what’s up with that? 

[Photo:  Kenya in flames.] 

Pop-culture

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jan 28th, 2008

 

And gay icons.

You have all heard the term gay icon, I’m sure.  Similar to pop icon, the terms refer to famous and/or popular personages who are idealized  and  idolized by a certain fan base.  A person usually becomes a gay icon because of his/her beauty, glamor, style or fashion sense, the drama or pathos of the person’s life, especially if it is marked by tragedy, or the person is perceived as an outsider.

Secular canonization.

In short, if the figure reflects any of the neuroses some psychologists believe underlie the homosexual adaptation; or if the figure ever suffered discrimination, persecution, or addiction to alchohol or drugs -  and especially those who have died tragically - then that person has a good chance of becoming a gay icon.  For instance, since the onslaught of HIV/AIDS in the early 1980’s, secular media and gay people have more or less canonized many sufferers who have died from the disease as gay martyrs.  At the same time, men or women who have died as a result of “gay bashing” are also canonized, if you will.

Mythic proportions.

The fact is however, the person elevated to the status of gay icon usually had no choice in the matter.  The person became a cult figure because of the meaning the fan base projected upon that particular person’s life and/or death.  The cult often develops independent of the person and is focused upon a perceived reality, of that person.  Their reputation  is often sentimentalized,  and as time passes, it is usually embelished by fantasy, romance, and heroism.  Even if these attributes are true, they are normally idealized.  In short, the cult figure becomes a patron saint of popular culture or gay people - sometimes both.

Gay icons are not always gay.

This whole thread came up on my other blog, Abbey-Roads, in a post I did marking the death of Heath Ledger.  A few commenters suggested he was a gay icon and for that reason did not deserve the press he received.  The same things were said about John Lennon, Princess Diana, and other celebrities when they died.  (Not that they were gay icons, but many felt they were undeserving of the press they received.)  I disagreed. 

Although I wasn’t a huge fan of Heath Ledger, neither was I aware he was considered a gay icon.  He made many more films other than “Brokeback” - but it seems his portrayal in that film is what garnered him the title of “gay icon”.  I’m certain he did not set out to gain that “honor” for himself.  In my post I wrote he would probably attain the cult status of James Dean, because of his great talent, young age when he died, and the tragic circumstances of his death - not to mention his popularity amongst young people.  I do not think it is appropriate to demon-ize a famous person simply because some people have declared him a gay icon.  After all, Ledger was simply a flawed human being - much like the rest of humanity - and he died suddenly at an early age.

Here is a short list of Gay Icons - personages some LGBT people have adopted as heroes:  (Go here for the long list.)

Catholic Saints: (Go here for more.)

St. Sebastian

St. Joan of Arc

St. Perpetua and Felicity

King David and Jonathan

Ven. Cardinal Newman

Secular gay icons:

Matthew Shepherd

Marie Antoinette

Alexander the Great

Judy Garland

Rock Hudson

James Dean

Marilyn Monroe

David Beckham

Cary Grant

I’m sure there are longer lists somewhere - but remember, this stuff is simply made up by a small group of people.   

The Capital Sins…

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jan 27th, 2008

 

And Pride.

All of our sins have their root in one or the other of the seven capital sins, depending upon the nature of the transgression, and all of these capital sins have as their source, the sin of pride.  I find it interesting that Tanquerey refers to the seven capital sins as “evil inclinations” or “tendencies” rather than sins.  Although he clearly states, “They are called sins because they lead to sins; they are termed capital because they are the fountain-head or source of other sins.” 

This is important for us to study, to know and be aware of, since we easily focus upon the symptomatic sins, and often ignore the root sin which is the source of a particular exaggerated act of the will.  Our will has a “two-fold motion”, the tendency towards what is good, or the flight from what is evil.  When these motions are exaggerated, excessive, or inordinate, resulting in consent and/or action, we identify these as  faults, imperfections, or sin - mortal or venial, depending upon the degree of seriousness of the act, consent of the will, knowledge, and so on.

Exaggeration and sin.

If indeed, as recent Popes have said, there is a loss of a sense of sin in modern times, I also think there is a great ignorance of what constitutes sin, and most especially - what the root causes of these sins are.  Since Vatican II the sacrament of penance gradually fell into relative disuse, although since the pontificate of John Paul II, that trend is rapidly reversing.  Yet because fewer Catholics were frequenting the sacrament of penance on a regular basis, and Catholic schools, as well as many parish priests taught very little about sin, I think an understanding of sin may have been lost on many people. 

For example, most understand that stealing, saying something mean about someone, or lying, and other such things are sinful, but we can often be unaware of the vice which motivated these faults.  Many times, we are not conscious that every evil or sin arises from a capital vice.  (Such as the sin of fornication arises from lust.)  Of course it is necessary that we confess only “actual” sins that are mortal, nonetheless it is helpful for us to understand the root causes of our sins as we strive to amend our lives and make progress in the spiritual life. 

For instance, it appears obvious that many people do not understand, (or if they do, they don’t think it is that bad), that “the first form of pride is to regard onself, explicitly or implicitly as one’s own first principle.”  It seems to me this is a very common attitude in our times.

Explicit pride. 

The athiest would be an example of one who explicitly regards himself as his own first priniciple, denying God and refusing to have him as his master, similar to the sin of Lucifer who refused to serve God.  Just so the rationalists who refuse to submit reason to faith, as well as intellectuals who reject traditional interpretation of dogma, and distort or change them to conform with their own views.

Implicit pride.

Tanquerey says “A greater number of people fall into this fault implicitly by acting as if natural and supernatural gifts which God has freely bestowed upon them were in every sense their own.  True, they recognize in theory that God is their first principle, but in practice they esteem themselves beyond measure, as if they were the source of the qualities they possess.” 

God alone.

Pride is the root of all evil - not money, as the saying would have it.  Tanquerey goes on to say; ”…pride, under one form or the other, is a very common fault, even among those who follow the path of perfection, a fault which stays with us through all stages of the spiritual life and disappears only when we die.  Beginners are hardly aware of it because their study of self does not reach deep enough.  Their attention must be drawn to this point; the more common forms of this fault must be indicated to them, so that they may make these the subject of their particular examination.” 

I think this is what I’ll be working on for this Lenten season.

All quotes taken from: “The Spiritual Life” - by A. Tanquerey.

Art:  Bosch - “Seven Deadly Sins” -  detail: Pride.

Our Lady of Bethlehem

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jan 27th, 2008

 

The Virgin venerated at Mission San Carlos, Carmel, California.

Our Lady of Bethlehem has been honored on the third Sunday after Epiphany for many centuries.  Blessed Junipero Serra brought the image of Our Lady of Bethlehem to Carmel By The Sea when he established Mission San Carlos.  Her image can still be venerated in a side chapel of the Mission church.  Read more.

PRAYER TO OUR LADY OF BETHLEHEM

Dear Lady of Bethlehem, Virgin most pure, Mother of our Savior, may the memory of the cold on the night Thy Divine Child was born bring Thy powerful intercession to bear upon the world’s coldness towards the Babe of Bethlehem. Send down into the hearts of all people some warmth of the flames of love that Thy Immaculate Heart gives forth.  Amen.

The protection of the Mother of God

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jan 26th, 2008

 

The Virgin of Citeaux.

A friend asked me to print this:

This special relationship of the Cistercian order with Mary was visually represented in sculptures, paintings and stained glass, and the General Chapter from 1335 prescribed that the official seal of every monastery should bear her image.  Mary was sometimes depicted protecting members of the Order beneath her mantle. This was based on the vision of a Cistercian monk who ‘fell into an ecstasy’ and viewed ‘the glories of heaven’. There he saw the angels, patriarchs, prophets, apostles, martyrs and confessors, all arranged according to whether they had been canons, Premonstratensians, Cluniacs or whatever order. Yet the monk saw that no Cistercians were represented, being quite troubled,  he voiced his concern to the Blessed Virgin, whereupon she replied that those of the Cistercian Order were so dear and beloved to her that she cherished them in her own bosom. “And opening her cloak, with which she seemed to be clothed, and which was of marvellous amplitude, she showed him an innumerable multitude of monks, lay-brothers and nuns.” - Cistercians

[Art: Image of Dominicans under the protection of Our Lady’s mantle.]

Old Testament Justice?

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jan 26th, 2008

 

Israel the exterminator.

Most Americans must have seen the news this past week, when the Palestinians in Gaza breached the wall which imprisons them, and hundreds poured into Egypt to purchase basic human necessities?  Media referred to it as an Exodus.  Egypt has been pressured to seal  the people off from entering their country by rebuilding the wall.

Why does the world tolerate these injustices by Israel?  How long is the world supposed to feel guilty for the horrors of the German holocaust?  And thus permit Israel to repeat virtually the same atrocities imposed upon European Jews by the Nazis, now upon the Palestinians?  Israel oppresses the Palestinian people who have a right to the same land Israel occupied after the war.  Israel has created a ghetto for the impoverished Palestinian people and seems to be bent upon exterminating them, and yet the U.S. government and the world stands by, endorsing such aggression.

A priest in Gaza pleads for his people.

A Catholic priest in Hamas-controlled Gaza has described the situation in his parish as “almost as bad as hell” and condemned what he called “punishment until death”.

“This is not punishment for salvation. This is punishment for extermination. It is the punishment of a nation.”

The priest explained how thousands of people had escaped Palestine into Egypt when gunmen blew up part of the border wall at the Rafah crossing overnight on Tuesday. The exodus has taken place as a result of an ongoing Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip to combat rocket attacks on its territory.

Mgr Musallam explained: “People have gone to find food and employment [in Egypt]. There is no food here, no employment here. We have a lack of water and electricity.

“The situation is critical. Streets are covered with sewerage. I see the sick crying and dying.

“Our hospitals need electricity and medication but out of 3,700 parcels of supplies only nine were allowed in.”

“I see children crying in huge distress all day long. Two pupils in the school, aged nine and six, were wounded in the bombings. They are afraid and traumatised because of the bombardments and of the darkness at night.

“They cannot even go to the toilet at night. They wet their beds but there is no water to wash afterwards. People come here to ask for water and electricity because we have a generator. They come to cook and they come for a shower.” - TotalCatholic.com

This is criminal - why isn’t Israel considered a rogue nation?

Vox Nova has a good commentary on the Israeli oppression of Gaza: Collective Punishment.

[Photo credit: “Palestinian Child” - Annie’s Letters Blog]

Next »

Free Catholic Books and Gifts!

Automated ads not within blogger's control. Report inappropriate ads.

Calendar

January 2008
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Pages

Categories

  • Blogroll

  • StBlogs Contest

    Incoming Links