On charity and anger.

Posted by Terry Nelson on Mar 5th, 2008

 

From the Desert Fathers…

Against false charity:  

“Theodore of Pherme said, “If a friend of yours is tempted by lust, give him a helping hand if you can, and pull him back from the danger.  But if he falls into heresy, and persists in spite of your efforts, go away quickly, cut off his friendship.  For if you stay with him, you may be dragged into hell with him.”

Righteous anger:

A brother asked Poeman, ‘What is the meaning of the text, “whoever is angry with his brother without cause” (Matthew 5:22)?’  Abba Poeman answered, ‘If you are angry with your brother for any kind of trouble that he gives you, that is anger without a cause, and it is better to pluck out your right eye and cast it from you.  But if anyone wants to separate you from God, then you must be angry with him.’

Matthew 5:22
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg Greek
22But I say to you, that whosoever is angry with his brother, shall be in danger of the judgment. And whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council. And whosoever shall say, Thou Fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

In praise of virginity.

Posted by Terry Nelson on Mar 5th, 2008

 

Sanctification of one’s state in life. 

I once worked with a woman who had desired to become a nun, but she fell in love and got married instead.  She actually worried she had chosen a lesser vocation and argued that marriage and virginity should be considered equally.  Yet the Church has always praised virginity as the highest state, simply because it can be compared to the angelic state, since angelic spirits do not marry.  In fact, the life of virginity anticipates the life in heaven.

Having said that - evaluating both states in such a manner is completely based on human judgment and standards.  It is not God’s way, but man’s way of seeing things.  What is important to any state of life, is doing God’s will.  If one is called to marriage, and one accepts the call, entering into the sacramental state of marriage can become a school of holiness.  A married person can become a saint just as well as a celibate person.

Another debate that goes round and round is whether or not the single life is a vocation.  Again - the issue gets confused.  Catholic single life necessarily implies virginity, not always consecrated by religious profession, and/or, even if lost - restored by the Blood of Christ in the sacrament of penance.  In my opinion, it is the state of virginity that is the essence of the “single vocation” - not being single or working at a particular job.

St. John Chrysostom on virginity.

“As you do, I also think that virginity is a good thing, better than the nuptial life. I add that it is as superior to the nuptial life as Heaven is superior to earth, or as Angels to men. 

Man, however, even though he is inferior to the angelic spirits, zealously and carefully seeks to be as much like them as he can. How does he do so? 

Angels do not marry, neither does the virgin man. Angels live before God always at His service; so does the virgin man. Human nature, which bears the weight of the body, cannot ascend to Heaven as the Angels do; however, to compensate such deficiency, man has the greatest possible consolation, that is, by living pure of body and soul, he can receive and posses in the Eucharist the King of Heaven.” - Source 

 Ordinary life.

Of course, scholars, theologians, saints, have all written on this subject, and students and religious continue to debate these things all of the time.  I prefer my simple understanding based upon common sense.  If you are single, and you are Catholic - male or female, you live a chaste, celibate life  - hence, you are called to live a life of virginity - it seems to me that is the vocation. 

Matthew 5:22
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg Greek
22But I say to you, that whosoever is angry with his brother, shall be in danger of the judgment. And whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council. And whosoever shall say, Thou Fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

What was Our Lady trying to tell him?

Posted by Terry Nelson on Mar 5th, 2008

 

Sun spotting. 

Fr. Zuhlsdorf translated a piece from Il Giornale revealing that Pius XII witnessed the solar miracle of Fatima while strolling in the Vatican gardens.  I had heard this before, although the new evidence claims he witnessed the prodigy four times.

“Pius XII saw the so called “miracle of the sun” while walking in the Vatican gardens.  The globe of the sun rotated and it was possible to look at it in a fixed way.  The same event occured on 13 October 1917 at Fatima, at the end of the Marian apparitions to the three little shepherds.  Pope Pacelli witnessed the identical phenomenon the day before the event, the vigil and the day of the proclamation of the Assumption of Mary into heaven (celebrated on 1 November 1950) and at last during the Octave of the same ceremony on 8 November.” - Fr. Z

As one of Fr. Z’s commenter’s noted, if Pius XII witnessed the miracle of the sun four times, why did he not carry out the consecration of Russia as Our Lady requested?  We may never know, but it is obvious Our Lady was pleased with the Holy Father, and his apparent neglect had no effect upon his salvation.  Indeed, he is a candidate for sainthood. 

(Don’t forget to vote for Fr. Zuhlsdorf in the 2008 Blog Awards.)

Matthew 5:22
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg Greek
22But I say to you, that whosoever is angry with his brother, shall be in danger of the judgment. And whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council. And whosoever shall say, Thou Fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

Free Catholic Books and Gifts!

Automated ads not within blogger's control. Report inappropriate ads.

Calendar

Pages

Categories

  • Blogroll

  • StBlogs Contest

    Incoming Links