Liars on the internet.

Posted by Terry Nelson on Mar 13th, 2008

 

Catholic bloggers are only voices - they are not the Church. 

I think some bloggers are not what or who they say they are.  I think a few seem  to be Catholic, but they are not.  Quite a few are protestant Catholics - commonly called ‘dissident Catholics’, or in some cases ‘rad-trads’ - they are both protestant however.  I think bloggers who claim to be Catholic generally are Catholic, but many seem to lack experience and don’t really know what they are talking about when it comes to dogma, discipline, liturgy, tradition, prayer and spirituality, and all of that.  Not a few bloggers are recent converts or born again Catholics - they go by the title, ‘reverts’.  Some are simply misfits spouting off interpretations of things they may have studied in the past few years.  (And some lie.)  But, like I said, many are in their first fervor and haven’t much more than a clue as to what living from faith is really all about.  Some are even self-proclaimed mystics with a private message from God.  Promoting oneself is usually a good sign of at least vanity, if not deceit. 

There are a lot of strangers out there blogging - be really, really careful.  (Maybe I should do a list?)

Art: “Ship of Fools” - Bosch 

I don’t know why…

Posted by Terry Nelson on Mar 13th, 2008

Ever since I was little, Palm Sunday always seemed protestant to me.  Of course it isn’t - but I don’t know what it is with me, even today, when I see pictures like this one, my knee-jerk reaction is that it looks protestant.  Maybe it is because while I was growing up, protestants seemed to go from Palm Sunday right into Easter, without focusing too much on the Passion of Christ.  I guess it was just one of my hang ups.

I don’t really like protestant spirituality and worship though.  And I don’t like protestant influences in the Catholic Church at all.

If you don’t believe it is a sin, is it still a sin?

Posted by Terry Nelson on Mar 13th, 2008

 

The wages of infection is death… or something like that. 

When I was little, my mom always told me not to pick at a scab, that doing so would cause an infection and I could die from an infection.  Fearful of getting an infection through a deliberate act, I reasoned if I accidentally pulled the scab off by rubbing it against something, it would be okay.  Scabs are itchy, so I’d rub my arm or leg against a tree trunk or something to peel it off.  I told myself I wasn’t doing it to pick the scab, but to itch it.  When it came off, I consoled myself that I had not deliberately picked it off myself - it had been an accident, it wasn’t my fault.  I never got an infection and I’m alive to tell about it.

I thought of my deceit in relationship to sin.  If I can’t help doing something, is it still a sin?  If I play around with an occasion of sin, or entertain a temptation, and then commit a sinful act, was it my fault?  If I carelessly shoot what I think is a deer in the bushes, and kill a man, is it still murder?  Anyone with a conscience should know the answers to such questions.

Bad is good.

Today however, many people, indeed, entire groups of people, decide for themselves what is a sin and what is not.  Living together without benefit of marriage, self-cultivation, homosexuality, contraception, in many cases - abortion, all of these grave sins are no longer considered sinful by half the population - including many Catholics.  No matter what the Church says - these people no longer believe such behaviors are sinful.

A new study  claims Americans overwhelmingly believe in the concept of sin, yet apparently do not agree with what behaviors constitute sin.

“Sin,” as defined by the research organization, is “something that is almost always considered wrong, particularly from a religious or moral perspective.” The study questioned more than 1,000 American adult respondents whether they believe in such a thing as “sin” and then asked them whether 30 different behaviors were sinful.

Out the list of 30 behaviors, adultery was most often described as a sinful behavior by American respondents (81 percent).

Following adultery was racism (74 percent); using “hard” drugs such as cocaine, heroine, meth, LSD, etc. (65 percent); not saying anything if a cashier gives you too much change (63 percent); abortion (56 percent); and homosexual activity or sex (52 percent) rounded out the top five behaviors most often considered sinful by Americans. - Source

How convenient. 

I’m not saying the study is accurate, I think there were only about a thousand people participating anyway.  Of course, most active homosexuals, people who contracept, even drug users, would say they do not believe their behavior is sinful.  People doing the stuff, embracing whatever sinful lifestyle they do, usually say they no longer believe what they are doing is a sin - they have an excuse for it.

That’s almost cute - if you are under 5 years old.

Child abuse.

Posted by Terry Nelson on Mar 13th, 2008

 

I read where Christopher Dawkins claims it is child abuse to indoctrinate 4 year olds into the Catholic faith - or something like that.  “I think it is a form of child abuse to speak of a 4-year-old child as a Catholic child..”   (I couldn’t get the link for the story to work at Pewsitters.)

Then I came across news that obesity may be ruled child abuse  in California.

Why not just make having children a crime in the first place?

What is important?

Posted by Terry Nelson on Mar 13th, 2008

The Archbishop is dead.

I read the news online; the Chaldean Archbishop Paul Faraj Rahho  has been found dead outside of Mosul.  He had been kidnapped in an ambush that killed three of his assistants on February 29.  The Chaldean Catholics in Iraq are persecuted and the world doesn’t care.

It makes me want to holler.

Change of habit.

Posted by Terry Nelson on Mar 13th, 2008

The above painting is of Margaret of Austria, taken from Jeffery Smith’s blog, Roving Medievalist.  Doesn’t she look like a nun?  Throw on a black veil for going outdoors, and it is a nun’s habit.  It was also fashion in her day.

Fashion has changed for royalty and commoners alike, but some people think women religious should continue to dress in medieval costumes.  (You know consecrated women religious - sisters - are different from nuns, right?  Indeed, I do like to see nuns in traditional habits and choir mantles.) 

Just a personal reflection. 

Free Catholic Books and Gifts!

Automated ads not within blogger's control. Report inappropriate ads.

Calendar

Pages

Categories

  • Blogroll

  • StBlogs Contest

    Incoming Links