Fat monks.

Posted by Terry Nelson on Apr 30th, 2008

 

A friend asked me about it.

Many people assume there are no fat monks - and I say, “But there are Blanche!  There are!”  Maybe not in all monasteries, but the monasteries I visited/lived in had fat monks.  And don’t forget Blessed Columba Marmion was kind of a porker. 

I did some research, and the idea of fat monks wasn’t alway so unusual.  In fact, in many respects, conventional monasteries often reflect the standards of nutrition and convenience of the upper middle class and wealthy of their day.  Today, all one need do is  visit any new or established abbey and check out their kitchens, laundry, common rooms, and in the case of some Benedictine abbeys - check out the individual cells. 

So yeah - maybe we don’t see many fat monks today, but it could be because they have a gym in the monastery, a fashionable lean diet, as well as peer pressure not to look like a slob.  Very few monks and nuns in the developed world go without anything they need, and in many cases what they want - not that anything is wrong with that.  (Of course - there are always exceptions, such as strict observance Carmelite nuns and Poor Clares, as well as other communities.)

Back to obese monastics.

I found a very interesting site that discusses this very subject.  I believe the study is factual and in my opinion and experience of contemporary religious life, understandable and believable.  I’ll post a few of the points I uncovered:

The jolly image of rotund Friar Tuck could be only partially true, according to a recent study of skeletal remains from monks that lived during the Middle Ages.

Analysis of monks who lived from 476 to 1450 AD revealed most were overweight, but perhaps not entirely jolly. They suffered from conditions associated with obesity, such as arthritis and back problems. 

The findings, presented at the recent International Medieval Congress at University of Leeds in England, has shed light on their monastic lifestyle.

The research could also help to explain civil unrest aimed against monasteries toward the latter part of the medieval age.Philippa Patrick, author of the conference paper and an archaeologist at University College London, analysed the skeletal collections at the Museum of London.    Patrick said that by the time most monks were 45 and over, they were three times more likely than the overall population to develop a condition linked to obesity known as DISH, diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. DISH affects the spine with lesions, making it harder for the person to walk and move.  The monks also were three times as likely to suffer from weight-related forms of arthritis.

Monks were the couch potatoes of their time.

 She said the monks’ sedentary lifestyle coupled with overeating led to the weight gain. Obesity was unusual in medieval times, a period when many people suffered from poverty, malnutrition and deadly plagues.“[The monks'] diet has been classified as ‘a form of high class diet’. That would mean very few people, only the upper echelons of society, could have managed to match the monks in terms of quality and quantity of their diet … but the inactivity probably didn’t help either,” said Patrick.She added that the monks ate animals they raised and used for secondary products, such as milk, butter, eggs and cheese. Monasteries also had extensive complexes of fish ponds to supply fish. - Read the whole story.  

Good grief! I don’t know what to do anymore!

Posted by Terry Nelson on Apr 30th, 2008

 

Confusion in the pews.

In the new calendar April 30th is the feast of Pius V who actually standardized the Mass.  (Trads-more-trad-than-trads love him!  In their opinion, there hasn’t been a pope (like him) since.)  But in the old calendar, today is the feast of St. Catherine of Siena, who BTW wasn’t a Doctor in the old calendar, although she is a Doctor of the Church in the new calendar - oh, and her feast was yesterday.  Then tomorrow is Ascension Day in the old (and in the new) calendar, but we don’t have to attend Mass in this archdiocese to observe the feast until Sunday - because it was transferred.  So, if we want to do a novena from the Ascension to Pentecost, doesn’t that mean it is shortened?  Is that a real novena then?  (It doesn’t really confuse me - but maybe some of my readers get confused.)

And then there is the question of Rogation  days and Ember days!  What are they anyway?  Isn’t that funny?  It doesn’t bother me, though it may bother people who follow the old calendar exclusively.  You see, for many of these folks, freeing up the TLM was never the only issue - not a few have problems with Vatican II itself.  [As do many others who insist they simply want the option of the TLM, while claiming  they accept the Conciliar reforms of Vatican II.  Right.]

Calendar

April 2008
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Pages

Categories

Blogroll