The lust that dare not speak its name.

Posted by Terry Nelson on May 6th, 2008

 

Silent no more. 

At one time of course, the word homosexuality was never spoken in polite conversation, in fact up until the 1950’s the only reference it might have received was limited to novels, the theater, and maybe the court docket or the list of vice arrests published in the local newspaper.  Otherwise the topic was rarely if ever discussed, and then only in whispers that wouldn’t permit the speaker to name the vice; rather the perpetrators and what they did came to be identified by more perjorative and descriptive terms, such as fruits, fairies, queers, gay, and other more vulgar appellations.  Legal, medical, and religious terms included buggery, sodomy, sodomites, and so on.  My point is that it was rare for the subject to be discussed openly as it is today. 

Private lives. 

In the last year I’ve been reading the lives of important figures in the world of design, fashion, and entertainment.   People most of my readers probably have never heard of, but who were influential in my career over the years.  Billy Baldwin, a New York designer, Van Day Truex, an important figure from Parsons and later a director at Tiffany’s, Bill Blass, a fashion designer, and the film and opera director, Franco Zeffirelli.   Aside from their great artistic talent and achievements which propelled them to the top of their profession, all of these men were homosexuals.  The only one to ever publicly reveal the issue was Franco Zeffirelli, and I expect that is because the political climate in Italy and the rest of the western world made it convenient for him to do so.  I mention these men because they quietly lived their lives without making a big deal out of their sexuality.  (Incidently, Zeffirelli, a Catholic, agrees with Church teaching that homosexual activity is sinful.)

Polite society.

Yes, the discretion exercised by these men was due in part to social restrictions and lack of acceptance, although many of their contemporaries perhaps “knew” about them.  Nonetheless,  of the three Americans, not one ever lived with a lover, although they had close male and female friends and companions.  All of the men were considered bachelors, and gentlemen - socially and professionally.  At the time, only the avant-garde, or the members of the artistic community would ever dare to be the least bit open about their sexual preferences, albeit never to the degree that people are today.

After Kinsey. 

Anyway - this is a long intro to a few personal observations on the subject of homosexuality.  People need to realize the public discussion has only been out there since the mid to late 1960’s, when popular magazines began discussing the sub-culture of homosexuality in various publications, such as Time and Life.  I’m sure the Kinsey Report (1948) along with academia, and popular culture (novels, magazines, tabloids, theater, movies) played a role in paving the way for more openess.  I do not presume to do a detailed study on the homosexual revolution here, but I do want to note how radically things have changed in society as regards the acceptance of homosexuality as well as the facade being constructed to hide what was once referred to as “the love that dare not speak its name.”

So few influence so many.

I hate long posts so I will conclude here for now.  Going forward I want to discuss this subject that seems to dominate the conversation in our culture and the Catholic Church.  A fact which should strike everyone as a rather curious phenomenon when one considers we are really only speaking about (in our nation’s case at least) less than 3%  of the population of the United States - who just happen to be very vocal.  (Some might say, “screamers”.  Kidding - I want to keep this light.)  

Our Lady of Good Success

Posted by Terry Nelson on May 6th, 2008

 

Have you ever heard of Our Lady of Good Success?

I rarely ever hear anyone talk about her.  This is another very interesting apparition that took place in colonial Quito.  It is significant because the Virgin told Ven. Mariana that her message was for our times.

“Our Lady told Mother Mariana that in our lamentable times, heresies would abound, the corruption of manners and customs would be almost complete and the light of the Faith would be nearly extinguished..”  -  Dr. Marian T. Horvat  

Finding the right Bishop…

Posted by Terry Nelson on May 6th, 2008

 

And free-agent priests.

Did you know that in the recent past candidates for the priesthood who were otherwise rejected from their respective diocesan seminaries could look, and find,  Bishops willing to sponsor them to ordination?  (I know a few - very good men, all of them.  The only reason they had been rejected seems to be they were either too traditional for the local seminary, or a bit odd.)  The newly ordained priest would subsequently be obligated to commit a certain length of time of service in the sponsor-Bishop’s particular diocese.  After that, the priest might be free to move on to seek incardination in another diocese if he chose to do so - or to become something of a free agent.  Men ordained in monasteries or for religious communities could also ask for ex-claustration in order to live independently.  Many times these men sought incardination in dioceses of their choice - after they left religious life and found a Bishop willing to accept them of course.  Some become hospital chaplains or teach at universities.

This post isn’t about anyone in particular - so I am not writing about you. 

Maya Angelou

Posted by Terry Nelson on May 6th, 2008

 

Silence 

I have a feeling many people may not like this woman - her close friendship with Oprah and all.  I expect she may be a big liberal feminist as well.  I don’t care, I happen to like her.  (And no - I have never read an entire book of her’s - just excerpts.)

When she was a little girl she was raped, and after she was asked to identify her attacker, she did so.  The man was killed, and young Maya felt she had killed him with her words.  She never spoke again - for years.  That is just so profound, such a lesson to me, one I find so hard to put into practice.

Reading other blogposts - I won’t name them - I notice, as anyone must  - lots of anger, contempt, and disrespect for so many fellow Catholics, but none more so than bishops and often times priests.  I think it takes a good year or two of blogging to learn not to do that kind of stuff - and much longer to avoid com-box combat.  It perhaps takes others a very long time to abstain from referring to the USCCB bishops as buffoons, or to have the effrontery to call a Cardinal an idiot and by his last name when mocking him outright.  But I digress.

I realized I’ve probably offended a few bishops and priests myself, and I’m not proud of that.  My first temptation is to imitate Ms. Angelou and say no more - ever - or at least to quit blogging.  Instead, I’ll continue writing posts for awhile, because there are a few matters I want to finish, but my conversation will be limited - so as to avoid insulting anyone else.  God willing, from now on, the only person I will defame is myself, the only criticism will be of me, and I will try to have fun doing it so everyone may continue to be entertained. 

Someplace in Scripture the Holy Spirit speaks:  “Set a guard on my tongue, and upon my lips an effective seal, that I may not sin by them.” 

Free Catholic Books and Gifts!

Automated ads not within blogger's control. Report inappropriate ads.

Calendar

Pages

Categories

  • Blogroll

  • StBlogs Contest

    Incoming Links