Men’s Fashion Week - Paris/Milan
After the fall.
The recent fashion weeks in Paris and Milan unveiled menswear collections for Spring 2009. This year Donatella Versaci based a portion of her collection on Obama, just as last year she drew inspiration from Monsignor Ganswein. Whatever.
The Parisian collections seem to have been the show-stopper of the entire season however, unveiling the androgynous look for men. Gay Paris I guess. Recall a few seasons ago how John Galliano’s (Dior) entire couture (women’s) collection was based upon the French Revolution, with mannequins made-up to look like sexy corpses, wearing jewels and crystals resembling bloodied necks, and so on. The Paris fashion scene is decidedly debauched and decadent, and it shows.
Effeminacy.
Although spin from Stephano Pilati of YSL declares - ”The original human nature was not like the present, the sexes were not two as they are now” a statement taken from Plato, although preposterously updated for the New Age - it is in effect a political statement. (The feminization of contemporary men is another story - although such fashions are part of the outcome.) The Paris show is decidedly one of many innovations designed to eliminate gender barriers and classifications traditional to Western civilization. Thus people can laugh the fashion shows off as insignificant entertainment in order to hype menswear and garner publicity - but I believe such productions are much more politically motivated than many people are willing to admit.
“The most striking thing is the amount of crossover from women’s collections that seems to be happening,” Michael Roberts, fashion director of Vanity Fair magazine, told The Associated Press. “A little bit of that goes a long way as far as I’m concerned. I just find it a little bit annoying that I’m supposed to be here for a week watching men’s shows, and I keep having to pinch myself to remind myself that I’m not in the women’s pret-a-porter,” he added. - Source
Pride.
Time will tell. At one time gay pride parades were just a few hundred people marching in stereotypical gay costumes - and people laughed them off. Today many still parade around dressed or undressed in outrageous costumes, although now days clergy, politicians, straight relatives and friends, along with thousands of other supporters join in the celebrations in major cities throughout the world. It has now become a formidable political movement, influencing government and religion, media and entertainment, and as always, fashion.
Designer, Stephano Pilati underscored the union of genders with a line for men made in fabrics normally worn by women — crepe de chine, organza, shantung and silk voile, all fabrics which float rather than fall.
In an era obsessed with global warming and sustainable development, the 44 spring/summer 2009 collections displayed at the four-day men’s fashion shows ending Sunday featured light airy see-through linens, silks and soft feathery cottons. - Source
Changing times.
Of course, the entire collections were not completely androgynous, straight fashions were included as well. Shrug. So anyway, a friend sent me the text of the prophecy of St. Nilus, here is an excerpt:
“After the year 1900, toward the middle of the 20th century, the people of that time will become unrecognizable. When the time for the Advent of the Antichrist approaches, people’s minds will grow cloudy from carnal passions, and dishonor and lawlessness will grow stronger. Then the world will become unrecognizable. People’s appearances will change, and it will be impossible to distinguish men from women due to their shamelessness in dress and style of hair. These people will be cruel and will be like wild animals because of the temptations of the Antichrist. There will be no respect for parents and elders, love will disappear, and Christian pastors, bishops, and priests will become vain men, completely failing to distinguish the right-hand way from the left. - Prophecy of St. Nilus
Links:
Men’s 2009 Paris fashion blurs gender lines.
Men’s fashion with a feminine touch; Paris 2009
(Thanks to Paula for the story and links.)


The opening prayer for the feast of St. Irenaeus immediately impressed me as one reason why this day was chosen by the Holy Father as a deadline for the SSPX to agree to the conditions offered for reconciliation.
I’m convinced that unconsciously, many American Catholics have been tainted by the “prosperity gospel” that has infected American Christianity since the days of Kathryn Kuhlman and Jim and Tammy Baker, fast forward to the mega churches of today. (Don’t forget the gospel according to Oprah either, with her doctrine of the “law of attraction” - you always get what you want.) I say this because the very idea of sacrifice, penance, suffering, or even chastisement seems to have vanished in “popular Catholicism”. Yet the first reading from Lamentations does not speak about prosperity at all.
So why does God permit bad things to happen to good people? If they were evil, or indulged in sinful ways, why didn’t He intervene to correct them? Why would He permit misfortune and setbacks to punish them? Of course, no one has to believe He cares either way. But then again, today’s first reading suggests to me that sometimes Our Lord does indeed permit evil as a means of correction or at least “discipline” as St. Paul teaches. Others might call it chastisement or punishment, as indicated by the prophet in Lamentations:
As always - these things are for the proper authorities to interpret and analyze, are they not? But as the famous philosopher Judy Tenuta always said, “It could happen!”
Editor’s note: Going forward on this blog, I will try to insert light-hearted photos and smiley faces to appease those who may be offended by my posts; those who think I’m too serious and focused upon Church teaching, or think I take myself too seriously, or think I’m mean and hateful, or who think I think I am some type of Church authority, and whatever else that offends dissident souls. Jesus was nice. ;)
“Everything seemed suspended for a moment. Was it a moment or was it an eternity? The crucifix before seemed luminous. Then as I gazed at the bread and the chalice they seemed to be one with the crucifix and they all took on a different dimension. It was like they opened up. A window or a door opened onto light. This makes it sound like what I experienced was somehow ethereal or ’spiritual.’ It was the opposite. Everything was far more concrete, far more solid and shared in a greater dimensionality than I can express, and the words came into my mind, “This is Reality.”" -