“If Loving You Is Wrong

Posted by admin on Jul 26th, 2008

 

“If loving you is wrong I don’t wanna be right
If being right means being without you
I’d rather live a wrong doing life.”

Sen. John Edwards chased by the paparazzi?

I read that Sen. John Edwards was cornered in a men’s room recently by paparazzi wanting to know about an alleged mistress and love child (Story here.).  It reminded me of a phone conversation I had with a friend about Babe Paley, the wife of William Paley, the president of CBS.  Babe was a famous socialite in the 1960’s in NYC, and up until she was dying of cancer, her husband fooled around with other women.  After all of these years, I’m always surprised to find out about marital infidelity.

Attempting to rationalize it, I stated I thought that a husband’s infidelity  was probably once considered simply something a man did - it was a guy thing - and most likely just part of becoming success in secular life.  (Remember the movie “The Apartment”?  All the executives had mistresses.  Martinis, cigarettes and a mistress seemed to be part of the status quo.)  It rarely meant the man didn’t love his wife. 

Although another friend reminded me of many of our friend’s fathers who also either had a mistress or just fooled around on their wives with an ever changing series of bar-flies - and we were just working class families.  So my theory of it being a product of affluence and status is shot down.  Perhaps I’m being naive, but I like to believe very few young men would cheat on their wives today…  Until I recall stories of young priests, like the well known television priest who betrayed his vows - a failing not much different from that of a cheating husband.  I guess human nature doesn’t change from generation to generation after all, huh? 

So why do men cheat?

Have they stopped loving their wives? Or is it “The being in love that makes them high” as the Michael Jackson song says? Then again, it could be what Loretta’s mother said in “Moonstruck” - men are afraid of death, so they cheat. I think it’s that simple in some respects and yet a whole lot more complicated, albeit motives may vary from case to case. I’ll just “think out loud” on this one however.

In many cases I believe the “new promiscuous” for youth has it’s roots in the “old promiscuous” of dad, or more frequently now days, of a mom. However, I’m focusing on the guys for this post. If there is a disorder, if there is something a guy is doing on the side, “hurting no one” as they say, he’s wrong. Disorder begets disorder. It impacts those nearest the unfaithful parent even if it is unacknowledged. Like alcoholism, there is enabling going on, denial - all the co-dependent stuff associated with the addiction. I’ve seen it. In my own family and the families of others. The guy who cheats is no longer present to his family or significant other - he’s “excommunicated” himself as it were.

I grew up with it.

Like I’ve said, I’ve seen what happens. The dad is gone at key times, or late coming home - he’s absentee. The mom is upset about it, tense and unhappy, resentful and passive aggressive, or she is in such denial, she works, shops, cleans, drinks, goes to Church - does something - compulsively to cope. She emotionally withdraws from the situation - or worse - overcompensates for the absence of the dad. Often no one ever acknowledges there is a problem, it gets repressed and everyone goes into denial mode. It screws up the kids - boys and girls. Especially when other addictions are involved.

So again, why do men cheat?

In many cases I think there is a lack of self-esteem, they feel like a failure - or maybe more telling - they are afraid of being a failure, a loser.  They may be overwhelmed with the stress of work and family life and seek an escape. That fear of death thing isn’t that off the wall. Death represents failure, preceeded by growing older and imagining oneself inadequate, no longer needed, etc. There are manifold components to this. Then of course there is just plain lust, that is so often mistaken for love, as evidenced by celebrities such as Donald Trump or film and pop stars, who have an endless string of marriages and divorces. The gratification in having someone that desires you sexually is a powerful aphrodisiac - more appealing in the moment than the presidency of the United States (obviously) or the love and devotion of home and kin, or even a new sports car - its an ego thing!

Pain reliever…

Whether there is a mistress or just a chain of more or less anonymous sexual encounters, the guy has chosen to resolve conflict in this manner, seeking affirmation and validation through a physical act. Sometimes, as in an affair, there is also a level of emotional involvement, often mistaken for love when it is really infatuation or inordinate affection and attachment at best. The guy may feel more appreciated or loved by his new paramour. As time and encounters go by he reinforces theses feelings by lavishing gifts and favors. I think it’s a power trip, as well as a control thing - something a man sometimes does when he feels he has been undermined in a relationship or situation, or when he senses the passion has died out in his current marriage.

Who’s the boss?

It can happen when both parties take one another for granted, and often enough, in today’s culture, the wife finds herself the dominate wage earner or may have a better position in the work force. Again this becomes hugely apparent in the exaggerated reality of celebrities lives; break-ups occur when one party becomes more successful than the other and one of them is caught cheating - it’s a compensation thing, I’m sure. I think it applies to ordinary couples as well. The cheating is a form of declaring one’s independence, while shirking responsibilty, as well as betraying commitment, all the while insisting that he loves his wife. It hurts the person one is having the affair with and it destroys families, while harming emotional and moral stability. It’s a moral dilemma, as such, it is not a ‘victimless crime’ and contributes to the further errosion of culture as well.

“I just want to have a good time!”

Ultimately, it boils down to men indulging the “joy of the will in natural goods” without directing and consecrating this joy to God. St. John of the Cross speaks indirectly of these things in “The Ascent of Mt Carmel” Book Three, Chapter 22. He likens this indulgence (by analogy, of infidelity) to drinking of the cup of the whore of Babylon when he asks;
“Who fails to drink little or much from the golden chalice of the Babylonian woman of the Apocalypse [Rev. 17:4]?

Going on to explain the harms that result;

“No matter how small the amount of this wine of joy, it immediately takes hold on the heart and subdues it, producing obscurity in the reason, as happens with those who get drunk from wine…
Spiritual weakness will augment and bring such evil on the soul that it will find itself a captive of its enemies, grinding at the mill like Samson with his eyes plucked out and the hair of his first strength cut. And afterward it (the soul) will perhaps die the second death as he (Samson) did together with his enemies.”

In the end, promiscuous behavior and infidelity become so habituated, that it may seem to be an addiction. Repentance followed by frequent confession, with prayer and the Eucharist are the steps one must take in order to amend one’s life and begin to repair the damage done to family and friends.

Art: Giotto’s allegory of “Infidelity” Scrovegni Chapel.

["If Loving You Is Wrong, I Don't Want To Be Right" - Lyrics, Barbara Mandrell, my favorite version sung by Luther Ingram.]

The nutty professor - who desecrated the Eucharist.

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jul 26th, 2008

 

Rebellious kid stories. 

I haven’t written about the UofM Morris professor who desecrated the Eucharist simply because the man was obviously craving attention and sought to add to the increase of mockery against Roman Catholics by the stunt.  I also think it was an abominable thing to do and not worthy of comment.  However, today the Minneapolis Star Tribune, as well as other prominent bloggers, have stories on the sacrilege, I’ll post the Strib article here:

‘The chancellor at the University of Minnesota, Morris, is standing up for a faculty member’s freedom of expression after the instructor posted on the Internet a photo of a defiled communion wafer with pages ripped from the Qur’an.

Paul Z. Myers, who teaches biology at the west-central Minnesota school, on his blog this week posted a picture of the wafer with a rusty nail through it and torn pages from the Qur’an. Also in the photo are tattered pages from a book by biologist Richard Dawkins that scoffs at the notion of a superior being.

This is the second time this month that actions such as these by Myers prompted a harsh retort from a national Catholic civil rights group.  In response today, University of Minnesota, Morris, Chancellor Jacqueline Johnson said the school has deactivated the link between Myers’ pesonal blog and the university website, emphasizing his views “do not reflect those of the University of Minnesota, Morris, or the University of Minnesota system.”

At the same time, Johnson said, while she believes “behaviors that discriminate against or harass individuals or groups on the basis of their religious beliefs are reprehensible,” the school also “affirms the freedom of a faculty member to speak or write as a public citizen without institutional discipline or restraint.” - Star-Tribune

Immature actions of a powerless individual.

Impotent acts, such as desecrating a communion host, no matter how sensationalized, may offer a false sense of power, vindication, even retribution, for an otherwise frustrated person.  “I destroyed God!”  Or something to that effect.  I knew a women who told me the story of how once, when she was little, she rolled the Host up into a little ball and threw it under a pew after communion - that is how angry she had been with God who she said permitted her to be molested.  She showed him!

P.Z. Myers, juvenile delinquent.

The absolute best response I’ve read regarding this matter is taken from Western Confucian.  This the comment Joshua left on the nutty professor’s blog:

I teach English at one of Asia’s premier science and technology universities, working with its graduate school of life science. There are many Christians in the department, both among the faculty and students.

And even among the non-Christians and atheists, such a juvenile act would never be considered. In Confucian societies, the title “professor” presupposes a certain level of maturity.

Also, the professors and students here in South Korea tend to stay in their labs until midnight or after everyday of the week, studying protein interactions and such things that might someday lead to cures for cancers and other diseaseas.

You’ve got too much time on your hands, sir, and are covering up the fact that you’re not a very good scientist. .

Art:  Vultus Christi

Prayer in reparation for blasphemy.

May the most holy, most sacred,
most adorable, most mysterious
and unutterable Name of God
be always praised, blessed,
loved, adored and glorified,
in heaven, on earth and under the earth,
by all the creatures of God,
and by the Sacred Heart of Our Lord Jesus Christ
in the most holy Sacrament of the altar.

The feast of Saints Joachim and Anne

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jul 26th, 2008

The parents of Our Lady.

Calendar

Pages

Categories

Blogroll