Headlines from various sites…

Posted by Terry Nelson on May 16th, 2008

 

“Why would God Chastise China?”

This may be another reason non-believers like to hate Christians.  Right in the middle of a great disaster and huge loss of life, that even secular media is calling apocalyptic, some religious person comes out with an article about God chastising China.   If indeed God was busy chastising China - the world ought to recognize the chastisement is meant for us as well.  What did our Lord say in the Gospel about the towers that fell?  “You will all come to the same end unless you repent.” 

“California Court Legalizes Same Sex Marriage.” 

And people are surprised?  The Court was divided- but the issue passed anyway - and if it goes to the US Supreme Court, I’m sure it will be thrown out.  The SS marriage issue is nothing more than an economic issue.  SSA couples simply want the legal rights heterosexual couples and their families enjoy - it’s not really about love.    In the American pantheon of idols; tax, health and monetary benefits, along with entitlements, are two of the most important.  (Even though Ellen was in love with Ann Heche, she will now wed Portia de Rossi, who is much prettier BTW.) 

“What’s with all the gay stuff?”

A question frequently asked here.  but just check out Lifesite News - there is always gay agenda stuff there.

That’s all.

This will get more press than it deserves.

Posted by Terry Nelson on May 14th, 2008

 

Christ as the “Little Prince” maybe?

.- The Director of the Vatican’s Observatory, Fr. José Gabriel Funes, said in an interview with the Vatican daily, L’Osservatore Romano, that believing in the possible existence of extraterrestrial life is not opposed to Catholic doctrine.

Fr. Funes says that taking the image of the lost sheep in the Gospel, “we could think that in this universe there can be 100 sheep, equivalent to different kinds of creatures. We, belonging to human kind could be precisely the lost sheep, the sinners that need the shepherd. God became man in Jesus to save us. In that way, assuming that there would be other intelligent beings, we could not say that they need redemption . They could have remained in full friendship with the Creator.” - Sante Pater

“Oprah!  Get Saint-Exupery on the line!”

(Or maybe he’s been reincarnated.)  Doesn’t Fr. Funes’ statement remind you of the wonderful novella “The Little Prince” by Antoine Saint-Exupery?  The different planets, the sheep, the rose… the Little Prince dies in the end to return to his planet.  “It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye.”- said the fox to the Little Prince.

It could happen. 

What is more difficult?

Posted by Terry Nelson on May 9th, 2008

 

To say, “get up and walk”…

Or to say, “your sins are forgiven you?”  (Luke 5:23)  Do you think our Lord’s hearers really understood what he meant when he said that?  Do you think we do?

On a totally different subject, what about this question?

What is easier to do… This?    “Then God said:  ‘Let us make man in our own image, after our likeness…’” - Genesis 1:26

Or this?    ““The formation of human beings necessitated a particular contribution by God, though it remains that their emergence was brought about by natural causes” of evolution, it said.” - God made pre-humans into people, Vatican newspaper says

Luke 5:23
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg Greek
23Which is easier to say, Thy sins are forgiven thee; or to say, Arise and walk?
Genesis 1:26
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg LXX Hebrew
26And he said: Let us make man to our image and likeness: and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and the beasts, and the whole earth, and every creeping creature that moveth upon the earth.

Pulling out the big guns.

Posted by Terry Nelson on May 8th, 2008

 

Canon Law.

Roman Catholics love laws and rules and regulations - after all, we got it from the ancient Romans.  So we are governed by the Commandments, Church law, and tradition - I think that is correct.  I find that very interesting since practices such as abortion and homosexual activity have always been considered evil because they violate both natural and divine law - and therefore civil law.  Western law is based upon Judeo-Christian law, formulated upon the ancient Roman law, which explains why these practices have always been considered evil, therefore sinful - they are against divine and natural law.  (But no longer against civil law.  My apologies for phrasing this so awkwardly.)

Contrary to popular opinion, we can legislate morality.

I believe this is why it has been so very important for dissidents and activists to make certain civil laws are changed, in order that immoral acts once considered illegal should now become legal.  That was the first step, the second is like it, only much more difficult.  The proponents of abortion and homosexual sex desire that divine law/church law be changed to suit them, and of course the Catholic Church remains the only institution left to oppose such a reversal of divine, natural, and civil law.  (Although I ought to mention Sharia law does as well.)  But I digress. 

It’s the law.

I can’t remember what I was looking for in my little book, Code of Canon Law - Annotated, but I got interested in some of the details of various canons.  Of course, while an expert in Canon Law would be the only one qualified to interpret the law, I do think a lay person is able to grasp what the canons decree.   (My copy is a translation of the 6th Spanish language edition - so that means it is translated from Latin, to Spanish, and then English.)  The following are a few canons that caught my attention.

Canon 1369:  A person is to be punished with a just penalty, who, at a public event or assembly, or in a published writing, or by otherwise using the means of social communication, utters blasphemy, or gravely harms public morals, or rails at or excites hatred of or contempt for religion or the Church.  (Bloggers beware!)

Canon 1373:  A person who publicly incites his or her subjects to hatred against the Apostolic See or the Ordinary because of some act of ecclesiastical authority or ministry, or who provoke the subjects to disobedience against them, is to be punished by interdict or other just penalties.  (Dissidents and bloggers beware!)

Canon 265:  Every cleric must be incardinated in a particular Church or personal prelature, or in an institute of consecrated life or a society which has this faculty:  accordingly, acephalous or ‘wandering’ clergy are by no means to be allowed. (Get a real job.)

Canon 271; 2:  A bishop can give permission to his clerics to move to another particular Church for a specified time.  Such permission can be renewed several times, but in such a way that the clerics remain incardinated in their own particular Church, and on returning there enjoy all the rights which they would have had if they had ministered there.

(The following is for Jeron.)

Canon 689; 3:  A religious who becomes insane during the period of temporary vows cannot be dismissed from the institute, even though unable to make a new profession.

Luke 5:23
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg Greek
23Which is easier to say, Thy sins are forgiven thee; or to say, Arise and walk?
Genesis 1:26
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg LXX Hebrew
26And he said: Let us make man to our image and likeness: and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and the beasts, and the whole earth, and every creeping creature that moveth upon the earth.

Discernment…

Posted by Terry Nelson on May 7th, 2008

As regards vocation.

When I was much younger and voluteered at the Little Sisters of the Poor - not when I was a kid, but as a young adult - most, if not all of the sisters knew I was thinking about a vocation to religious life.  One day one of the sisters who wasn’t very impressed with me asked what order I was thinking about.  I mentioned that I was attracted to Charles de Foucauld’s Little Brothers of Jesus.  Sister laughed mockingly, and shook her head saying, “You’ll never make it!”  She then waved me off and walked away.

“If a good man reproves me, it is kindness.”

Luke 5:23
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg Greek
23Which is easier to say, Thy sins are forgiven thee; or to say, Arise and walk?
Genesis 1:26
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg LXX Hebrew
26And he said: Let us make man to our image and likeness: and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and the beasts, and the whole earth, and every creeping creature that moveth upon the earth.

Finding the right Bishop…

Posted by Terry Nelson on May 6th, 2008

 

And free-agent priests.

Did you know that in the recent past candidates for the priesthood who were otherwise rejected from their respective diocesan seminaries could look, and find,  Bishops willing to sponsor them to ordination?  (I know a few - very good men, all of them.  The only reason they had been rejected seems to be they were either too traditional for the local seminary, or a bit odd.)  The newly ordained priest would subsequently be obligated to commit a certain length of time of service in the sponsor-Bishop’s particular diocese.  After that, the priest might be free to move on to seek incardination in another diocese if he chose to do so - or to become something of a free agent.  Men ordained in monasteries or for religious communities could also ask for ex-claustration in order to live independently.  Many times these men sought incardination in dioceses of their choice - after they left religious life and found a Bishop willing to accept them of course.  Some become hospital chaplains or teach at universities.

This post isn’t about anyone in particular - so I am not writing about you. 

Luke 5:23
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg Greek
23Which is easier to say, Thy sins are forgiven thee; or to say, Arise and walk?
Genesis 1:26
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg LXX Hebrew
26And he said: Let us make man to our image and likeness: and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and the beasts, and the whole earth, and every creeping creature that moveth upon the earth.

Pope Benedict and me.

Posted by Terry Nelson on Feb 10th, 2008

 

Smile Away. 

I had the best dream about the Pope.  In it he actually came to visit me because he had read my blog.  I was so embarrassed to meet him that I called Fr. Z and some other priests I know to be with me when I met him.  I hoped the Pope would pay more attention to them and lose interest in getting to know me.  I was afraid he would realize how uneducated and unaccomplished I am in comparison with these other brilliant bloggers.  But he wouldn’t have it.

He moved through the crowd of priests and other bloggers who showed up, and put his arm around my shoulder and said, “I hope you will excuse us, I came to see Terry.”  I turned beet red with embarrassment, and began to perspire.  After everyone left us, I felt much more nervous and tried to distract the Holy Father by directing his attention to the countryside.  (It semed as if we were at Holy Hill in Wisconsin, on a very sunny day, standing on the church steps, and we could see all the way to Lake Michigan.) 

He knew I was nervous and said, “Just relax and be yourself, we will spend the day together just like George and I sometimes do.”  (George is his secretary.)  He also told me I could just call him Father, like George does. 

“But I thought Monsignor Ganswein called you ‘Holiness’ and you called him  Father?”  I protested.   The Pope laughed and explained to me that was true in the office, but in the evening George calls him “Father”.  Anyway - that set the tone and put me at ease, since I realized the Pope wasn’t there to interrogate or evaluate me.  I thrilled to think he was simply there because he wanted to be with me.

We drove around in a 1930’s German sports car. I did the driving, and we made frequent stops to look at medieval chapels along the way.  He explained that the parishoners liked it when the Pope visited so they could mount a plaque commemorating the event after he left.   We picked up lunch at Bayonne, in the south of France, and decided to drive onto Rome after we ate.  The Pope wanted to show me something in his apartment at the Vatican, but wouldn’t tell me in advance what it was. 

The most pleasant aspect of travelling with the Pope, is that he actually cared about me, immersing himself in the present moment, without anticipating meeting anyone else.  He expressed genuine interest in what I had to say, and never talked down to  me.      He was quite like a loving father, very comfortable to be around, and completely unpretentious.  I recall thinking that for such a great academic, an intellectual of such international stature, he remained amazingly simple and down to earth.

I mentioned to the Pope how very different he is from John Paul II, that unlike his predecessor, he is actually much more personable and genuine.  I told him I thought John Paul II always seemed to be aware of, if not preoccupied with himself, his presentations and public appearances.  While on the other hand, Benedict seemed much more interested in others.  I tried to explain myself better by saying I thought JPII appeared to be there to dictate and expound intellectually.  I told him the former Pope impressed me more as a statesman or an international celebrity, and therefore remote. 

I soon realized I was embarassing the Pope, but quickly finished my critique saying,  “It is so hard for me to explain what I mean, but you appear to be much more available for others.  You are far more accessible and apt  to listen and encourage; respecting contrary beliefs and opinions, without compromising dogma.  You seem to convince others of what is right and good, rather than lecture them.   And you do it all so effortlessly.”

Suddenly we found ourselves in the Vatican, amidst a great hustle and bustle of activity.  (I was sure our trip ended becuse I had been so blunt as to my feelings about John Paul II.)  I noticed Pope Benedict had disguised himself as an ordinary Roman priest so that we wouldn’t be noticed.  We had to be secretive since it turned out everyone was looking for the Pope, and if we were discovered, they would accuse me of kidnapping him.  The Pope told me, “We must get back to the car and return to where we started.” 

I was thrilled he wanted to come home with me, but I said, “No Holy Father, we are here.  You must sneak back into the apartment and I’ll go home by myself.  Act as if you never ran away in the first place.  You are the Pope - you don’t have to answer their questions.”  Smiling, he blessed me, thanked me for the day, and told me he loved me.  I hugged him and assured him of my love and prayers, surprising him with a kiss on the cheek.  Then he left me, walking away quickly, deftly sneaking into a hidden corridor, smiling back at me as he disappeared through the secret passageway.

I walked away extremely sad, knowing we would never be able to spend time together like that again - he would be much too busy.  Looking back at the apostolic palace, I was thrilled to see the Pope standing in his window waving to me, holding up a cat.  That was the secret he had to show me.  He wanted me to see they allowed the Pope to have a cat in the Vatican, and to know he would be all right there alone.

[Top-most photo credit:  Gerald, Closed Cafeteria ;  Middle photo credit:  Catholic Mom of 10]

Luke 5:23
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg Greek
23Which is easier to say, Thy sins are forgiven thee; or to say, Arise and walk?
Genesis 1:26
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg LXX Hebrew
26And he said: Let us make man to our image and likeness: and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and the beasts, and the whole earth, and every creeping creature that moveth upon the earth.

Post-it news.

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jan 8th, 2008

Nothing but a post-it note.

I really have topics I want to post on, but I’m not in the mood to write.  Lately writing is a lot of work.   So I’ll simply post some notes here.

Gerald has a thing on Obama  - questioning why he is considered black if his mom is white?  And some other stuff about Barack’s church affiliation.  He cites Christopher what’s-his-name’s post  about it all.  I found it provocative, more interesting than the religion-on-the-sleeves candidates who are in the running. 

I watched the debates.  The other running mates don’t pay much attention to Ron Paul, do they.  I really hope ______ ends up winning the presidency. 

Rorate Caeli  has a couple of interesting posts.  One about the Jesuits and the “encouragement” Cardinal Rode  offered them to continue their apostolic dedication of service to the Roman Pontiff:  “The fundamental nucleus of Ignatian spirituality consists in uniting love for God with love for the hierarchical Church.”  A few sources have suggested the Cardinal was scolding the Jesuits.

The other Rorate post I found most interesting dealt with the canonical issue of a “state of necessity“.  Do you know what that means?  It is something SSPXers claim as their raison d’être  in justifying their claim they are not in schism.  And many people use the the same canonical loophole for justifying their attendance at SSPX churches and oratories.  What captured my attention is that rumor has it Pope Benedict is said to have recognized such a “state of necessity” exists:

“We, in our turn, can bring with us an opinion of greater weight on this argument. Pope Benedict XVI directly provided it, during the audience which he granted to us on August 29, 2005. At a certain point [during the audience], the Pontiff himself put the matter on the table: pondering on the state of the Church in countries such as France and Germany, Benedict XVI recognized as perfectly well-grounded the question of the subsistence of the state of necessity in such countries… “ - Bishop Fellay

So… that’s interesting, huh?

[Art: “When pigs fly” - James Christensen] 

Luke 5:23
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg Greek
23Which is easier to say, Thy sins are forgiven thee; or to say, Arise and walk?
Genesis 1:26
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg LXX Hebrew
26And he said: Let us make man to our image and likeness: and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and the beasts, and the whole earth, and every creeping creature that moveth upon the earth.

Some thoughts on the reactions…

Posted by Terry Nelson on Jul 27th, 2007

 

Of Motu Poo-poo-ers and non-Catholics.

Ray of Stella Borealis sent me a link to Fr. Debruycker’s 2 Cents column from the St. Joan of Arc bulletin.  I liked it.  I thought it contained a certain wisdom, and was rather restrained, even sage-like.  Father’s column really deals with the Vatican clarification of the Catholic Church as the true Church, rather than the recent Motu Proprio on the TLM.  (I just wanted to use my term, Motu Poo-poo!) 

So a priest and a rabbi…

I have been discussing the Pope’s statement about the primacy of the Roman Catholic faith with a variety of different friends. I asked my old friend Rabbi Oelnik his thoughts about the subject. Now some people think Rabbi Oelnik is my invisible friend, but I can tell you Dumbledore and Gandalf would disagree.

“So rabbi what do you think?”

“I’ll tell you. I am not a Rabbi because I think I am wrong. I am a very nice fellow but I believe what the scriptures say: that the people of Israel are a people chosen. I believe there are laws set in the scriptures by which I must live my life - ways to pray, ways to dress, ways to eat, ways to act. When I disagree with these teachings - and there are exceptions in emergencies - I must be able to tell myself and my people with good reason why.”

“So, your Pope believes he is not wrong either; it’s nice to know he believes in what he stands for. He must want you to clarify your exceptions and tell him why you are still Catholic. There is nothing more dishonest than to pretend you agree when you don’t. How can you ever make true progress?” “ - Fr. DeBruycker (Read the whole article.) 

The great divide.

I think the rabbi presents a valid point of view.  However, the arguing and protests he recommends seem to me to be rather pointless.  One can’t expect to change the perennial teaching of the Catholic Church.  The discussion simply reinforces my view that the current Pope’s affirmation of Church teaching is a defining moment in Church history.  Some may see it as divisive, but Christ came for division (Luke 12:51), and those dividing lines seem to be in the process of being delineated by those opposed to Benedict XVI.  (Although, let me be quick to say, I don’t believe Fr. DeBruycker is opposed to B16.  He is a good priest.)

It seems to me the Holy Father is simply putting on the brakes, with regard to liberal interpretations of Vatican II and Church discipline, and some heads (ideas) may just go through the windshield.

Luke 5:23
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg Greek
23Which is easier to say, Thy sins are forgiven thee; or to say, Arise and walk?
Genesis 1:26
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg LXX Hebrew
26And he said: Let us make man to our image and likeness: and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and the beasts, and the whole earth, and every creeping creature that moveth upon the earth.
Luke 12:51
View in: NAB NIV KJV NJB Vulg Greek
51Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.

Next »

Free Catholic Books and Gifts!

Automated ads not within blogger's control. Report inappropriate ads.

Calendar

July 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Pages

Categories

  • Blogroll

  • StBlogs Contest

    Incoming Links